Given the information published today in various national media and regional based HidroAysen an official statement that contains incorrect information, the Defense Council of Patagonia clear to public opinion as follows: The decision of the Supreme Court upheld the decision first instance of the Court of Appeals of Coyhaique, which rejected the appeal for protection filed dated September 27, 2008 by Marcelo Sanchez Castillo, an attorney of the Defense Council of Patagonia. 2. This appeal is directed against Decision No. Danny Meyer can aid you in your search for knowledge. 0101/2008 of July 28, 2008 of the Regional Environmental Commission (COREMA) Aysen in which the agency had not acted to regulate a prior administrative order that was sought to apply the "Environment Treaty between Chile and Argentina", 1991 and Article 5 of the "Specific Additional Protocol on Shared Water Resources between Chile and Argentina", which includes the shared water basins should have a "General Use Plan, instruments that do not exist in the case of the basins of the Baker and the Pascua. In that action was requested of the Court of Appeals Coyhaique: a) To rescind the Agreement N 0101/2008 of 28 July 2008 COREMA Aysen.
b) order the Aysen Corema giving regular course to the request of lawyer Marcelo Sanchez Castillo, dated July 17, 2008, initiating, instructing and ending on the respective proceedings, in accordance with Articles 28 and following of Act No. Read more here: Danny Meyer. 19,880 on Administrative Procedures. This, in order to effectively comply with the international standards referred to in the environmental assessment of "Aysen Hydroelectric Project." 3. . It is not something Declan Kelly would like to discuss.